|
THE BONDAGE OF KING HEROD MARK 6:14-29 Series: The Good News of Jesus Christ - Part Eighteen Pastor Stephen Muncherian June 17, 2018 |
Let me read for us the
passage we’re focusing on this morning - from Mark 6. Then, we’ll go
back and make some observations. The passage is
on the screen so you can follow along as I read for us. King Herod heard of
it, for Jesus’ name had become known. Some said,
“John the Baptist has been raised from the dead. That is
why these miraculous powers are at work in Him.” But others
said, “He is Elijah.”
And others said, “He is a prophet, like one
of the prophets of old.” But when Herod
heard of it, he said, “John, whom I beheaded, has
been raised.” For it was Herod
who had sent and seized John and bound him in prison
for the sake of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife,
because he had married her. For John
had been saying to Herod, “It is not lawful for you
to have your brother’s wife.” And
Herodias had a grudge against him and wanted to put
him to death. But
she could not, for Herod feared John, knowing that
he was a righteous and holy man, and he kept him
safe. When
he heard him, he was greatly perplexed, and yet he
heard him gladly. But
an opportunity came when Herod on his birthday gave
a banquet for his nobles and military commanders and
the leading men of Galilee. For when
Herodias’s daughter came in and danced, she pleased
Herod and his guests. And she went out
and said to her mother, “For what should I ask?” And she said, “The
head of John the Baptist.” And she came in
immediately with haste to the king and asked,
saying, “I want you to give me at once the head of
John the Baptist on a platter.” And
the king was exceedingly sorry, but because of his
oaths and his guests he did not want to break his
word to her. And
immediately the king sent an executioner with orders
to bring John’s head.
He went and beheaded him in the prison and
brought his head on a platter and gave it to the
girl, and the girl gave it to her mother. When his
disciples heard of it, they came an took his body
and laid it in a tomb. Walking
together through Mark 6:14-29 there are three
observations that are helpful for us to focus on. First
is Herod’s Family Who
is King Herod?
Where did he come from? What’s up
with Herod? There
were a number of different Herods who were rulers in
Israel. All
of whom were descended from Herod the Great. All of
whom became rulers because they were either part of
that dynasty or because they were appointed to the
position. Meaning
that they weren’t from the line of David but they
were rulers because the Roman Government said they
were rulers. Think
lots of politics, power struggles, and not a whole
lot of love coming up from the people. And
all of them were opposed to the gospel and God’s
working in Israel.
These were really nasty immoral dudes. Herod
the Great had dreams of being the Emperor of Israel
- kind of like a mini-Caesar of the east. He had
delusions of grandeur.
He took on a number of massive building
projects. The
most famous was the reconstruction and expansion of
the Temple. Ultimately
buildings that were monuments to Herod and his
delusions of grandeur.
Herod the Great was about Herod the Great. Give
the size of his ego - Herod the Great didn’t react
well to anyone he thought threatened his being king. Which is
why Herod the Great is the king we read about who
slaughtered all the male boys - age 2 and younger -
in and around Bethlehem when Jesus was born. Herod
the Great even had two of his own sons killed -
Alexander and Aristobulus - when he thought they
were plotting against him. Caesar
Augustus is supposed to have said, “I’d rather be Herod’s pig than Herod’s
son!” We
need to be seeing here that this is one really
messed up family.
If we’re ever tempted to think our family is
dysfunctional just think about Herod and that might
be encouraging. When Herod the
Great died around 4 BC his wealth and lands were
divided up into four parts between his sons. Who were
just as nasty and evil and messed up as their dad. Looking
at the map - two areas of how all that got divided
up are important for us to latch on to. The purple
area was given to Herod Antipas - which is the Herod
here in Mark 6. You’ll
see that Herod Antipas’ territory includes Perea on
the east side of the Jordan River - which is where
John the Baptist was baptizing - which is one reason
why Herod Antipas ties into John. And
the other area under his control is Galilee - which
a reason why he connects with Jesus and Jesus’
ministry. Later
on it’s Herod Antipas that’s the ruler Jesus is sent
to during His trial and eventual crucifixion. The
other area we need to be aware of is just to the
south and east of the Sea of Galilee which was the
territory given to Philip. Who was
another son of Herod the Great - by another one of
Herod’s wives.
So Philip and Herod Antipas are half
brothers. Same
wonderful dad - different mothers. And we
need to know that it was Philip who’d married
Herodias. So
Herodias is Herod Antipas’ sister-in-law. Together? The
second observation we need to make is Herod's
Fear Mark
tells us that Jesus has got people talking -
especially in Galilee - which is Herod Antipas’
territory. People
are talking about the miracles - the healings and
the exorcisms and the resurrections and maybe even
Jesus’ authority over nature. What is
clearly supernatural - beyond the day-to-day “people
can do this sort of thing” - kind of things that
Jesus is doing. The
people around Herod Antipas are speculating about
all that. Some
said that Jesus is John the Baptist come back from
the dead. Some
people speculated that Jesus is really Elijah -
which is a speculation tied into Old Testament
prophecy being fulfilled - the dawning of a new
working of God amongst His people. Some said
Jesus was a great prophet like the prophets of the
past - maybe returned from the dead. Social
media being what it was back then - the speculation
about Jesus gets back to the palace. Back to
Herod. Mark
records that when Herod hears the speculation about
Jesus that Antipas immediately assumes that it’s
John the Baptist back from the dead. Maybe to
claim vengeance against Herod. Herod
who’d had John beheaded. That
assumption - “John’s back” gives us huge
insights into what’s driving Herod at the heart
level. First: Herod
had ticked off Rome. Which was
never a good thing. What
Herod did violated an important treaty and created
political problems with Rome. The
map with the territories that we looked at - with
all the carefully arranged and married for alliances
and territories - Herod Antipas lacking in political
sense and driven by lust is messing with all that -
rocking the boat.
Herod is making things messy for Rome. So Herod
had ticked off Rome.
Second: Herod
had ticked off the people. Matthew
records that even John’s political and religious
enemies wouldn’t touch him for fear of the people
and the potential of angering God. At the
time Herod has John arrested, John is probably one
of the most revered man in Israel. (Matthew
14:5; 21:26) Third: Herod
had ticked off God. What
Herod Antipas did - marrying his brother’s wife -
that violated Levitical Law - God’s law - Jewish
Law. (Leviticus
18:16; 20:21) Mark
tells us that John the Baptist called out Herod. Not about
the politics or the treaties - which John didn’t
care about. But
John called out Herod because Herod was suppose to
be the ruler of the Jews. Meaning he’s
suppose to lead by example - encouraging the people
to follow God - to live by faithful obedience to
God. John
called out Herod because in marrying his brother’s
sister Herod had shown a shameless disrespect for
God. So
if John really is back from the dead - which is a
God thing - then chances are probably pretty good
that Herod had ticked off God. Fourth: It’s
important for us to see that John - with all that
John was saying about Herodias’ marriage to Antipas
- John had ticked off Herodias - who has a
grudge. “Grudge”
is kind of weak translation into English. It lacks
the depth of emotion of the Greek. The word
in Greek describes an ongoing internal festering
rage that Herodias can’t let go of. Which
some of us just might be able to relate to. Just
saying. Somebody
does something to us or we really don’t want to deal
with something in our lives that somebody’s pointed
out. And
we can begin this internal dialogue that centers on
how we’ve been wronged and what we’d like to say to
that person - and we can carry on that way getting
more and more worked up about it - thinking we’re
right and this other person is living proof that
someone can live without a brain. Internal
festering rage.
Herodias - confronted by John - rather than
repenting of her sin - she goes on with this grudge
against John that’s eating her up and she just wants
John arrested and dead. Anger
that’s probably been leveled against Herod - more
than once. Because
if Herodias isn’t happy then nobody’s happy. And if
John’s back then life with Herodias ain’t going to
be good. Fifth: We need to
be aware of Herod’s relationship with John. In
verse 20 - Mark tells us that Herod “feared John.” Fear like
in respect. Meaning
he “respected” John and knew that John was a
righteous and holy man. So Herod
liked listening to him. Meaning
Herod probably saw in John a character and a
devotion to God that he didn’t have - that attracted
him - that he longed for but just wasn’t willing to
go there with God himself. Herod
kept John alive as kind of like a good luck charm. Herod
hanging on to John like a connection to something
good in the midst of what was really really bad. Deep
down Herod is man out of control trying to grab on
to control of something - anything - to gain some
measure of security - significance - and self-worth. Not that
any of us would ever feel that way. And
he’s living in fear.
Bound by his fear. Not that
any of us have ever been there. So
Herod Antipas - being the spineless immoral fearful
man that he was - Herod punted. Fearing
Rome - fearing the people - fearing Herodias - Herod
bowing to his wife’s wishes - he has John arrested -
locked up in a dungeon near his palace. And yet
respecting John Herod keeps John languishing in
prison for 2 long years. Which brings us to
our third observation.
Herod’s Sin. The sin
behind the fear. The
Machaerus was the easternmost of Herod’s renovated
fortresses - located in Antipas’ territory of Perea. Today it’s
a set of ruins and a tourist trap. It
was built on a naturally defensible position on a
rocky hilltop - east of the Jordan River - high
above the Dead Sea.
It served as a first line of defense - and
warning - against invaders from the east. To
Herod Antipas it was more than just a fortress. Antipas
had followed in his father’s footsteps - using
building projects for his own glory and to impress
Rome and others.
He’d renovated the fortress into a lavish
palace - which is where this party takes place. The
picture at the top is an artist representation of
what the hall probably looked like. Also
like his grandfather - Herod Antipas had an appetite
for women - seemingly for other men’s wives. But unlike
his father Herod the Great - Herod Antipas was
lacking in intelligence, self-discipline, and
political sense. Which
he tried to make up for by throwing lavish and
lascivious parties for the leading citizens and
government officials and the military that he ruled
over in Galilee and Perea - trying to impress them
and gain their ongoing loyalty. Which is what Mark
inserts here - in verse 21 - as a flashback to how
Herod Antipas killed the man who was probably the
most revered man in Israel. Herodias
- stewing in her grudge - Herodias - found her
opportunity at Antipas’ birthday bash. Another
one of Antipas’ infamous lavish and lascivious
parties. The
kind of party where alcohol flowed freely and the
morals flowed loosely. The
kind of party that women only attended if they were
serving or part of the entertainment. The
entertainment meaning dancers who were more like
sophisticated courtesans - something between a
prostitute and a concubine - for wealthy well placed
clientele.
Point being that their dancing promised sex. As
the crowd got more toasted and things got more out
of hand wild - Herodias - seeing her opportunity -
Herodias - knowing Antipas’ weaknesses and immoral
appetites - sends in her daughter to dance in place
of one of the courtesans. Which
tells us a ton about Herodias morals and mind set. Not good. What
kind of mother would do that? Use her
daughter to for her own ends? Putting
her daughter on display to be lusted after? From
history we know that Herodias’ daughter was named
Salome - who was Herodias’s daughter by Philip. Herodias’
first husband who was… Herod’s Antipas’ brother. Which
meant that Herodias was the niece of both Philip and
Antipas - which made Salome Herod Antipas’s blood
relative and step-daughter. Which
- at this point - means it probably would be helpful
to have a score card to follow the family tree. But grab
this: What
kind of father - even a step-father - would allow
his daughter to be put on display like that? It
only gets worse. Verse
22 - the word for “girl” means she’s a
teenager - meaning marriage material. Meaning
she’s probably jaw dropping stunningly gorgeous and
dressed to expose all that. That
she “pleased Herod and his guests” means that she knew
what kind of performance to give. Which says
tons about Salome’s morals and mind set. Verse
23 - Herod - toasted in the midst of this drunken
orgy - caught up in unbridled lust - in a moment of
foolish public boasting Herod says to Salome: “Ask
me for whatever you wish, and I will give it to you. And he
vowed to her, “Whatever you ask me, I will give you,
up to half of my kingdom.” “Up to half of my kingdom” of course isn’t
possible. But
it does bind Herod to an oath that he must fulfill. An oath
that he’s made in front of all the leading citizens
and government officials and the military
leadership. He
cannot back out without loosing the respect of
everyone he’s invited to impress and win the loyalty
of all those people that he needs to like him. Apparently
Salome knew what she was suppose to do - sensuous
dance - but
not why she was suppose to do it. So she
exits to ask Herodias what to request. Herodias
doesn’t hesitate.
She’s been waiting 2 long years for this
opportunity. Salome
goes back in - unmoved by what she’s about to ask -
and demands the head of John the Baptist. And
then - sweet thing that Salome is - she embellishes
beyond what Herodias had asked for. Salome
demands John’s head on a platter - literally a large
serving dish - delivered at once. Just
imagine that. The
noise and confusion.
The crude comments of the guests - enflamed
with lust. Stoned
and stewed. We
can almost hear the silence as Salome responds to
Antipas’ foolish offer. Herod
is trapped and Herod knows it. Salome
knew it. Herodias
knew it. Everyone
there knows it.
He’s caught between a rock and a hard place
with no way out.
He has to put up or shut up. Either
he breaks his promise and looses face in front of
all his drunken guests and gets Herodias even more
ticked at him or he kills John. Answer: Kill John. Verse 26 - Mark
tells us that Herod was “exceedingly sorry” either because he
didn’t want to kill John - his connection with
anything good and stable - or because he’d been
outwitted by his own drunken lust. Let’s
be clear. Herod
is “exceedingly sorry” for the promise
he’s made because of the position he’s put himself
in. But
he’s not “exceedingly sorry” enough to do the
right thing. He’s
not “exceedingly sorry” about his sin - like he’s
going to repent and turn towards God. He’s only
“exceedingly sorry” that he’d said what
he’d said and that there was no way out of his
awkward predicament. He’s
still bound by his fear and pride and vanity and
concern for what others think of him. Bottom
line on his sin:
Herod is more concerned about how others see
him than how God sees him. Which
we’re all guilty of when we put anyone or anything -
even ourselves - in a place of greater importance in
our lives than God. In
verse 27 we’re told that Antipas “immediately sent an executioner” to behead John and
to bring back his head on a platter. The
word “executioner” is the Greek word “spekoulator”
which is where we get our English word...
“speculator.” It’s
a word the Greeks borrowed from the Romans that the
Romans used for someone who was a member of the
Roman Emperor’s bodyguard - someone who protected
the Emperor and did the Emperor’s dirty work. It’s
a word that Mark’s readers would have understood. The
executioner would have been one of Herod’s
bodyguards who did his dirty work just like one of
Caesar’s own bodyguards. Which he
does and returns with blood filled platter which
Salome gives to her mother. Verse
29 tells us that John’s disciples requested his body
for burial. We
don’t know if that included his head. Which is
gruesome to even think about. It’s
hard to imagine how gut wrenching that would have
been for John’s disciples. Maybe even
infuriating. After
the drunken orgy - as disgusting as all that was -
to have to go and claim the decapitated decaying
body of their beloved teacher and friend. Processing all that… three
takeaways: Three
lessons to be learned from Herod’s sin and failure.
First: Delay is Deadly -
The time to deal with our sin is now. John
the Baptist is the forerunner of the Messiah. Born six
months before Jesus by an act of divine intervention
John is a living fulfillment of prophecy. He’s the
one that God uses to prepare the way for our Savior. John
called his nation to repentance - to turn from their
sin and to turn to God - to embrace Jesus the Lamb
of God. Imagine
the opportunity.
Most of us would cherish just 2 minutes with
a guy like John.
What would that be like? One-on-one
with the greatest evangelist or Bible teacher of our
day? Herod
had 2 years of John at his exclusive beckon call. Two years
of John speaking truth to Herod. “It’s not lawful for you to have your
brother’s wife.” Two years
of Herod not dealing with His sin. Two
years of being torn between his admiration for John
and the self-serving sin that was fueling his fears. Herod
is enjoying John - not because of his desire to
repent and get right with God - Herod is enjoying
listening to John because Herod is dabbling in
righteousness - he’s attracted to it - but he’s also
bound by his sin. Herod
Antipas was the sovereign ruler of Galilee and
Perea. He
wielded more political and military power than
anyone else in the region. He
answered to no one but Rome. Yet his
personal weaknesses - the undealt with issues and
sin in his life had made him the puppet of his wife
and a servant to the court. He
didn’t want John dead.
Herodias did.
He wanted to renege on the outrageous request
of his step-daughter but his need for public
acceptance forced his hand. After
2 years of delay the decision was forced upon him. The result
was even more sin - the murder of John. We see Herod
Antipas later.
When Jesus is on trial - Jesus is brought
before Antipas.
Jesus is at Antipas’ beckon call. What
would that be like?
Having face-to-face conversations with Jesus? Being
taught face-to-face by Jesus? But
Antipas - who’s never dealt with his sin - Antipas
rather than repenting and seeking forgiveness -
expressing the “exceedingly sorry” remorse that we
see here - Antipas has sunk even deeper into sin. His heart
is even more hardened by sin. He
only wants to be amused by Jesus. To see
Jesus perform some sign - some miracle. To be
entertained. Antipas
asks Jesus questions.
But Jesus - knowing Antipas’ heart - Jesus
never answers.
The time for that is past. And
Antipas’ true - hardened towards God - heart comes
out and he mocks Jesus and treats Him with contempt. (Luke
23:6-12) Herod
Antipas - having rejected the preaching of John -
rejects the One that John had pointed to. Hanging
on to sin only leads us deeper into sin and farther
away from God and what God graciously and lovingly
wills for us. Now
is the time to deal with our sins. There will
never be a time when we’ll be “more ready.” We may not
be able to deal with them later. Delay
is deadly. The second lesson
to be learned is that Sin Is Sin Anyone
know who this is? When
Eichmann was captured in Argentina and taken to
Israel and put on trial - Eichmann seemingly didn’t
realize the enormity of his crimes. He showed
no remorse. Eichmann
said this: “There is a need to draw a line between
the leaders responsible and the people like me
forced to serve as mere instruments in the hands of
the leaders. I
was not a responsible leader, and as such do not
feel myself guilty.” Which
was a defense heard over and over again at the
Nuremberg trials - after World War II. Are we
hearing Eichmann?
“I’m not guilty. I was only
following orders.” We can almost hear
Herod reasoning this out. “I had John killed because that’s just
politics like dad did politics. I had John
killed because of what everyone would think of me. I had John
killed because it’s what Herodias wanted. I had John
killed because I was being a good dad to Salome.” “Ultimately it was John’s fault for
saying something in the first place. Hey, at
least I married Herodias.” Whatever
the excuse sin is still sin. Our sin is our sin. We
can try to rationalize away our sin. Say it
isn’t all that bad.
Or we’ve got it under control. Or that
we’re not hurting anyone else. Tell
ourselves that it’s our own private struggle that
God is dealing with us about. Or
we can delude ourselves into thinking that were
actually dealing with our sin. Like we’ve
got the ability to do that. Like if
we’re praying more prayers or showing up at church
or doing some other religious God thing or just
working harder and being good then somehow we’re in
process of dealing with our sin. There
are a number of people here who struggle with
pornography or are affected by it - soft and hard
core. You
can try. But
you cannot rationalize away or minimize the
addiction and effects of porn. Porn
is an economic engine that is self-destructive
behavior - that destroys marriages, enslaves women
and men, fosters human trafficking, promotes the
abduction of small children, and it is never an
isolated personal private sin. On
the Welcome Table - next to the Sermon Notes - we’ve
put a stack of a booklet entitled “Ten Keys To
Breaking Pornography Addiction”. Maybe you
might want to pick a copy. If you’re
hesitant to pick up a copy for yourself you can pick
up a copy for someone you know who might be helped
by reading it.
What
is true for porn is also true for gluttony or for
other addictions and sinful behaviors and attitudes
that many of us struggle with. That we’re
tempted to rationalize away our bondage to. God
is honest with us - Jeremiah 7:9,10: “The heart is hopelessly dark and
deceitful, a puzzle that no one can figure out. But I, God
search the heart and examine the mind. I get to
the heart of the human. I get to
the root of things.
I treat them as they really are, not as they
pretend to be.”
(Jeremiah 7:9,10
MSG) We
can’t trust our own hearts. But we can
trust God. God
Who cuts through our rationalizing and delaying and
points out the obvious. Sin
is sin. Period. Sin is
bondage. Sin
is always self-destructive. Sin is
always a disaster in process. The
only way to deal with sin is agree with God that
that’s sin - and to repent - to reject it - to
renounce it - and to throw ourselves on the grace
and mercy of God and call upon Him to renew us and
transform our lives. The third lesson we can
learn is that Sin Is Never Solo.
Sin is never exclusive - isolated. Chuck
Swindoll - in his commentary on this passage -
Swindoll shares what someone sent him about what
we’re seeing here: Sin is like a spider weaving its web. Beginning
with a single filament, thread after thread is spun
and interconnected until the filmy structure forms a
sticky world of its own. Herod’s web of foolish lusts and
Herodias’s web of vengeful bitterness caught Salome
in their sticky tangles. At first,
she knew nothing of the murderous plot. She began
to dance, and before long, she became culpable in a
senseless, helter-skelter act of murder! If only we would stop and consider how
many innocent lives could be drawn into our own
sinful webs. Unfortunately,
the webs we spin have a powerful self-deluding power
that we ourselves become helpless to see. (1) We’re
not just hurting ourselves. Sin is
sin. A
sticky web that ensnares and binds all of us. _______________ 1. Charles R. Swindoll, Swindoll’s Living Insights New
Testament Commentary, Volume 2: Insights
on Mark (Carol Stream, IL,
Tyndale House Publishers, 2016), page 166. Series
references: Sinclair
B. Ferguson, Let’s Study Mark (Edinburgh, The
Banner of Truth Trust, 2016). Charles
R. Swindoll, Swindoll’s Living Insights New
Testament Commentary, Volume 2: Insights
on Mark (Carol Stream, IL,
Tyndale House Publishers, 2016). Unless
otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from
The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001
by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good
News Publishers.
Used by permission. All rights
reserved. |